Are “vagueness” and “ambiguity” shortcomings of language or can they be viewed as positive aspects of language? Explain.
Language is naturally vague and ambiguous and, although they can be seen as shortcomings, they are also positive. Without the ability to be vague and ambiguous, it would be impossible for art to flourish. The arts make use of vagueness and ambiguity, so as to create a sense of beauty or mystery. Without these attributes, it is likely that civilisation as it is would have turned out very differently – plainer, duller, less mysterious for those who are perhaps adventurous. Despite that, they are also possible shortcomings. Language when translated into others loses some of its original meaning without fail, no matter how good the translation may be. This is one reason why new translations of books in different languages are constantly being released – that is, to update older translations with newer ones that possess a more solid and accurate translation. Additionally, vagueness and ambiguity when not intended, have the ability to mean something other than its original meaning. Should this occur, when misunderstandings happen, it can lead disagreements and even violence – this, without doubt, is a shortcoming.
Regardless, it cannot be forgotten that without vagueness and ambiguity, culture and art are devalued. They are tools, and even other than the arts, they can be tools for debate, justice, or (for the rebellious) even to see if one can get away with something by giving a flowery explanation to whoever decides what happens to them.